« Barnstable taxpayers; Kiss your ass goodbye, because the airport's defense team has to be on Queer Street, and going down if they're relying on me to toss them a lifeline... | Main | Know a nine-year old? Have he or she take this short quiz to learn if they are smarter than Linda Hutchenrider, Ruth Weil, and John Klimm…. »

TrackBack

Comments

Gary - IN FAIRNESS TO LINDA HUTCHENRIDER, she gave me the option to hold the petitions, was professional and courteous, and even said that she did not want our efforts in gathering all the signatures to be wasted. No town attorney was available to consult, and it was late in the business day, so I chose to hold them one more day and gather some more signatures for insurance. Sorry for any misunderstanding here, I know you received the information second hand, and just wanted to clarify that the town clerk could not have been more fair or reasonable. Thanks.

Gary - What do you think of the argument that the business to residential ratio does not make the split tax workable? This is the new pound of sand being fisted from the joakim camp.

Barnstable does not have the the correct ratio of businesses to residences to properly support a split tax to the benefit of the entire town.

The business to residential ratio is manufactured propaganda by the business tax class that doesn't want to pay property taxes.

In 1988, when Route 132 was one lane all the way from Route 6 to the Airport Rotary, and the Festival Plaza (Blockbuster's, Friendly's, Shaws, Toys R Us, etc. was the Hyannis Drive In Theatre, and Olive Garden, Borders, Christmas Tree Shop, Sleepy's were groves of holly trees, and the Cape Cod Mall was half its size, the commercial levy was 24%.

Today, despite hundreds of millions of dollars in commercial development, the commercial levy is less than 10%.

Although the former assessor who was in charge of undervaluing commercial properties went to prison for child pornography, he should have been charged with malfeasance in office.

The former Assessor's replacement quit the job after a year because he couldn't do a proper job correcting assessing mistakes.

The new Assessor claims he has control, but the CVS property sale for $3.2 million while it is assessed for $885,000 indicates he has his head up his ass as well.

To the DIMMEST bilb in the chandalier from 7:39 am this morning, NO OFFENSe but your comment HAS to be the MOST stupid and foolish comment I have ever seen written, or heard....

Here, let's see what part of the following you don't seem to understand....

You say WHAT? Barnstable does NOT have the WHAT? The 'correct ratio' of businesses to residences? Mind telling us what kind of drugs you are on?

Here, consider this. MOST, and we MEAN MOST, businesses in Barnstable paid the SAME or many even LESS in property TAXES here in barnstable in 2007 thsn they did in 1992!! And this is PURE FACT!

So come back in here and explain that one, please? As gary has pointed out time and again, along with a DEDICATED INTELLIGENT COMMITTEE of very good men (including Tony Pelletier, John Brennan, Joe Dugas, Al DeFlorio, Dom Gautreau and a couple others), the BUSINESS folk in our town HAVE NOT PAID THEIR FAIR SHARE now here in this town for a VERY LONG time and people like YOU don't get and never will!

So like a lot of other clueless people in this town, you perhaps lack the real ability to have any kind of real understanding of the tax structure in any way....... not surprising nor is it surprising that like the other clueless people who have no basis for statments like the one you made, you have to log in anonymously...... True liberal nitwit....... mouth off with NO BASIS or facts and stay neatly hidden behind you anonymity...

Gee, what a surprise. Any bets this might have come from one of our grand 'councilors'?

Oh, and 7:39, if by chance you do log back in, PLEASE, by all means, do also explain the CVS sale of $ 3.2 MIL and HOW AND WHY the building was only assessed at 889? Any ideas there brainchild?

If you cannot get to the fundraiser tonight, please send Greg a check: PO Box 1208 Hyannis, MA 02601-1208

(508) 771-1427

Don't get me wrong. I like and respect town clerk Linda Hutchenrider.... but I agree that for her NOT to accept the signatures yesterday was wrong....... I would like to see ANYONE show me where it says that ANY petition CANNOT be truned in BEFORE all the required number of signatures is in hand.....

The fact is that 343 people signed the petition. Only 300 signatures were needed. SO WHAT if 53 people's names were tossed out for whatever reason? All that would mean is that another 7 signatures would be needed. No problem. Those could be had in 10 mminutes...

So for our very own town clerk to NOT accept these, I am disappointed, to say the least... in the meantime, no offense but I WOULD HOPE and reasonably EXPECT that the town ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WOULD HAVE AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION for the Town Clerk, and apparently one of them was NOT!

Let's see now, we have HOW MANY TOWN ATTORNEY's on OUR TAX DOLLARS?????

SIX! I said SIX!

So here we are all over again with INCOMPETENCE up to our eyeballs!

We have a Town Clerk who did not have the answer to a question. No problem. The clerk is NOT an Attorney but damn it, WHERE was RUTH WEIL? Where was Asst Atty David Houghton or the other invisible Town Atty?

Sure as #### these ATTORNEYS make our GOOD $$$$$ so they SHOULD BE AVAILABLE!

Taryn, THANK YOU for your efforts! But please, let these people who make OUR GOOD $$$$$ know we EXPECT them to be AVAILABLE! This was a Thursday afternoon and NOT a Saturday or Sunday morning!

PAR FOR THE COURSE in this town!

Excellent point on Councilor James Crocker!

Why is he on the town council?

Since there are no other "districts" in Barnstable in which officials are elected, the charter clearly speaks to Prudential Committeemen, Fire Commissioners, Water Commissioners, and Moderators of the fire and water districts.

The Chairman of the Charter Commission was a former town councilor from Precinct One, and was elected to the Prudential Committee of the Barnstable Fire District.

He simultaneously held two elective offices, but the same Town Clerk never challenged him.

John, Linda made the effort to look at the charter and to call the town attorney to see if I could add to the signatures should more than 43 be scratched. She said generally, and I have heard this from many others involved in peitioning towns, that about 25% of signatures are not good. It was 4:15, and it was Valentines Day. The charter does not address the signature issue in the open meeting of the voters, I did not want to wait for the attorney to call back, and made the decision myself to hold onto the signatures. If Mrs. Hutchenrider were really out to harm the effort, she could have accepted the petitions happily, scratched more than 43, and possibly told me I would have to do it again. I felt she was more than fair and I will hand in the petitions today. No big deal, really.

PO Box 1208 Hyannis, MA 02601-1208

Who should the check be addressed to...

Taryn, I am not blaming Linda the town clerk. I AM disgusted with the FACT that the BARNSTABLE TAXPAYERS HAVE TO PAY FOR SIX LAWYERS on OUR payroll and NOT ONE of SIX coule be located to answer a damn SIMPLE question?

Or is it that we will HAVE TO SUBCONTRACT THIS OUT TO A ###### other law firm and WASTE MORE MONEY for idiotic nonsense?!

TRUST ME on this:

The TAXPAYERS here are going to be mad as hell when I GET the INFORMATION on just HOW MUCH we have had to pay for OUTSIDE LAW FIRMS! I have been waiting now since last JULY and the MORONS from our town hall have REFUSED to give me this simple request for PUBLIC INFORMATION.

I promise Ruth Weil I will be in again to place my FOURTH request for this>

Maybe it is time for the BOSTON GLOBE to come here and request this because sure as crap the TIMES won't!

Taryn, we ALL deserve better with OUR MONEY! And again, I do not have the problem with the town clerk!

Phone number above for Greg is not correct - Greg may be reached at 774-836-0960.

You people are wasting your time with one-way Milne. He's using you. If you contribute you'll be throwing your money down a rat's ass.

John - Ruth Weil is among those being summoned to the open meeting of the voters. Perhaps you can ask her about the monies being spent on attorneys trying to stop Greg Milne from serving on the charter commission, as this question would not pertain to the actual litigation of the matter.

WHY NOT INVITE JANET JOAKIM? I AM SURE GREG WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE HER MONEY. COME ON DOWN, JANET!!!

11:11 Milne is not -using- anyone, at least any more than they are using him. These 13 councilors are all supported by those whose interests they represent. Simple stuff, and politics 101. As the council continues to pull stunts like the one at the January 17th meeting, a guy like Milne becomes more attractive to a wider range of voters. The shell fisherman are particularly fond of him at the moment. Wake up and smell the clams, squid!

the ONLY thing I will do with Ruth Weil is give her a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST for the info...... I have no use for David Houghton who is still jerking the Attorney from the Sec of State's office around! STILL!

I be any money that Ruth Weil WILL respond to my request as she knows the SECRETARY OF STATE's Lawyer is on this case. David Houghton thinks he is smart by jerking their lawyer around but he needs to think again.

what in those rectrix emails gary?

Wait till you guys hear the JERKING around Taryn got today when she went to turn in the signatures in to the town clerk..........

Folks, this is GARBAGE and we all might just have to call the STATE SECRETARY OF STATE's OFFICE!

These asswipes in this town really think they can keep steamrolling over the people here..........

Things get worse every day around here....

gary will give all the details.

Milne is only in it for Milne. I will never support someone that insults the town workers behind the workers backs. Milne knew what he was doing when he was running for 2 offices. I can't see how any of you don't see how him getting voted into the charter commision is not an elected office.

Rob Bastille really needs to get a life, or at least get laid. As for the 9pm comment, you are almost as lame and tired as Bastille and his faltering Hyannis News site. Jimmy Crocker should not be sitting on the council right now, if your argument holds any water, which it does not. Milne is for A NEW CHARTER, dumbass! We need an elected executive official right now. We do not need more of what we have now. Go look at the town council video from January 17th, and tell me if you think this form of government is working. If you think it is, then you must be posting from prison.

The 9 p. m. commenter must be on drugs........ Apparently you can't read. The charter position is NOT an elected 'office' but rather a position. An OFFICE election links two things with it. One is compensation and two, an actual TIME frame of which one will actually serve.

The charter position is more of a voluntary POSITION than anything else. So Janet, WHAT part of that do you not understand? And your anger toward Greg is unbelievable.... you need help. Go get some, please.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 11/2005