Remember Moe Wyman’s pitiful petulant nagging performance before the Klimmboobs last year.
Moe co-owns at least a dozen Burger Kings on the Cape and South Shore, yet he came out to town hall to gripe about pissing away discretionary money to pay the costs of financing the town’s school, police, DPW, health, and debt amortization.
Recently COG has learned that homeowners have been financing his hedonistic spending.
For example, not only did Moe’s home in Cummaquid make the foreclosure list, but also he's Barnstable's only person to make the state’s biggest deadbeat tax delinquent list at $135,000 in arrears.
CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE
Moe came to the dais a year ago and said,
“In thirty-eight-years I’ve never seen my taxes go down"
"I don’t know what the gentlemen said (referring to John Julius who listed significant property tax bill reductions for a half-dozen commercial properties).”
What Moe really meant to say was thanks to the generosity of the town council, his commercial property taxes dropped by 30% over the last nine years.
The only things that went up at his Burger King’s are calories;
The latest published nutrition information indicates a person will consume 2,500 calories if he or she ordered;
A Whopper with cheese
a medium order of fries, and
-
a medium chocolate shake,
or three days worth of calories at one sitting.
In actuality Burger King in Florida pays Moe's North Street property taxes, because Moe doesn't own the property.
Moe doesn't pay property taxes on the Route 6 store either as the place is owned by the state.
The Florida Burger King property division paid $4,200 less property taxes in 2009 than it did in 2000.
Posted is a list of Moe's business property taxes in 2000 and 2009.
In 1985 the Massachusetts legislature gave Barnstable taxpayers a “kiss in the mail” when it enacted the split tax law by enabling the council to impose a 50% greater tax rate on commercial properties to make-up for the unfairness between residential and commercial assessments.
Unfortunately year after year the people you elected have rejected the gift.
Despite unprecedented commercial growth since 1986 (when Route 132 was a two-lane road all the way from Exit 6 to the Airport Rotary) the commercial share of financing the town was cut in half (from 20.5% to 10%).
The increase in numbers of new commercial buildings from 1986 through 2009 was 35% (from 1,206 to 1,855).
The number of new homes constructed in Barnstable from 1986 through 2009 increased 13.5% (from 18,011 to 20,529).
EVERY JERK-OFF IN THE WORLD CAN SEE BARNSTABLE'S TAX BURDEN HAS BEEN FAIR, ESPECIALLY ASS-ESSOR RUDZIAK from POLAND.
Every year we hear the same old story; housing values increased while commercial property values remained fixed.
The question your town council should be asking is;
Commercial property taxes dropped from a high of $13.64 to a low of $5.80, or 57%, while commercial property values increased 140%, compared to the 391% increase in residential property values.
Since Janet Joakim and Janice Barton were elected in 2001, the CIP levy dropped -$579,533 (from $10,137,545 in 2000 to $9,558,012 in 2009 which is a minus 6% drop.
During that same period homeowner property taxes
increased 49%
from $53,452,543 in 2000
to $79,506,446 in 2009,
or an increase of $26,053,903.
Let’s compare the Barnstable Town Council's eschewing the legislature's offer for property tax relief by increasing commercial property taxes in full anticipation that business will recoup its extra taxes by increasing prices on goods and services.
Since 75% of gross sales in Barnstable occur during the summer months, out-of-towners/staters will pay part of your property tax bill.
The Illinois legislature granted cities and towns 2% of its 10% sales tax.
Since the average home in Barnstable is worth $492,000, and the levy will be $92 million, I wonder what property owners will do with all that extra money, if there were no property taxes to pay?
Does anyone think, homeowners would spend most of it?
Let's compare Shaumburg, Illinois with Barnstable
Shaumburg's Demographics.
As of the census of 2000, there were
75,386 people,
31,799 households, and
19,301 families living in 33,093 housing units.
The racial makeup of Shaumburg was
78.78% White,
3.35% African American,
0.10% Native American,
14.19% Asian,
0.06% Pacific Islander,
1.73% from other races, and
1.78% from two or more races.
5.29% Hispanic or Latino.
There were 31,799 households out of which
28.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them,
49.9% were married couples living together,
8.1% had a female householder with no husband present,
and 39.3% were non-families.
32.3% of all households were made up of individuals and
7.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older.
The average household size was 2.36 and
the average family size was 3.07.
The population was spread out with
21.9% under the age of 18,
8.3% from 18 to 24,
36.3% from 25 to 44,
24.0% from 45 to 64, and
9.5% who were 65 years of age or older.
The median age was 35 years.
For every 100 females there were 94.8 males.
For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 91.9 males.
According to a 2008 estimate, the median income for a household in the village was
$70,454,
and the median income for a family was
$85,068.
Males had a median income of
$60,704 versus
$46,518 for females.
Gary,
Send this post to the idiots from the HYCC, otherwise known as the Hyannis area Chamber of Commerce. On second thought forget it. They are like Moe here, just too damn DUMB to get it. And Moe, when was that renovation happening? Amd how long have you been 'paying your taxes, and never seen them drop'..... at least he referred to me as the 'other gentleman.' Moe said, "I don't know what that other gemtleman was talking about."
NO MOE, you sure as HELL don't now do you?!
Posted by: John Julius | November 28, 2009 at 04:55 PM